Najib-rosmah-Endless Possibilities
Cynicism is never irrational. The irrational, often wrong, sometimes right, are impelled by instinct, heart or even conscience. Cynics are morality-proof. They prefer data to truth.
the Mere Mockery of a Trial’:dramatic work in which highly improbable plot situations, exaggerated characters, and often slapstick elements are used for humorous effect
The cast of this murder mystery – including the prime minister himself – are not yet off the hook, pending appeals and a civil suit that promises more answers.
Abdul Gani Patail: never doubted his ability, decision runs according to script Justice is about posturing
 Report No : 7380/06 Station : Travers Name : Sirul Azhar bin Haji Umar IC No : RF125591 Race : Malay Date/Place of Birth : 29-1-1971 Age : 35 years male Occupation : Police officer Address of workplace : UTK, Bukit Aman Name of father : Haji Omar bin Haji Hassan Address of father : Deceased Recording Officers : Insp Nom Phot a/l Prack Dit at Office D6, 3rd Floor, Bukit Aman on 9th November 2006 at 1307 afternoon.Interpreter-from-to- On 19th (sic) November 2006 I was asked by the investigating officer K/ASP Tony Anak Lunggan to record the statement of a Malay inmate named Sirul Azhar Bin Haji Omar Kp RF 125591. The inmate was then brought to me and I ordered the release of his handcuffs. I then interviewed the inmate who appeared to be proficient in Malay. I also found the inmate in good health. I then read out the warning under Section 113(1)(a)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to the inmate as follows ;- IT IS MY RESPONSIBILTIY TO WARN YOU THAT YOU ARE NOT OBLIGED TO SAY ANYTHING OR TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. BUT WHATEVER YOU SAY WHETHER IN ANSWER TO A QUESTION OR NOT SHALL BE GIVEN AS A STATEMENT. S. Do you understand the warning that has been read and explained to you? J. Yes I understand. S. Do you have any questions about the warning? J. No. S. Do you want to give a statement? J. Yes I want to give a statement. S. What do you want to tell me? J. As a member of the Special Action Unit (UTK) on an undetermined date 5 or 6 days before the incident on 19thOctober 2006 while I was in my office I received a telephone call from Tuan Azilah (Azilah) the officer above me requesting that I meet him in Central market. I could not meet him at the time because I was together with Tuan Khairy as his driver. At that time, I was driving Tuan Khairy to deliver hampers in Selayanga and Batu Caves. On my way to there roughly after 12 noon I received another call from Azilah who asked me where I was and I told Azilah I may be late coming back as I was assisting an officer and I replied I would call him back after completing my duties. At around 3.00pm, after dropping off the officer at the office in Bukit Aman, Azilah telephoned me again and told me to meet him in Central Market. At about 3.15pm I met Azilah at Central Market. He instructed me to observe Malaya Hotel where the woman who was disturbing the businessman [sic] stayed. Azilah also informed me there were three women staying in a room on the 8th floor, the number of which I am unable to recollect. After that I went together with Azilah in my car, a Satria bearing registration number WEA 4717 to look for Malaya Hotel. On the way there, Azilah talked about a reward of between RM50,000 and RM100,000 if the case was settled. Azilah and I however failed to locate the hotel after circling the area many times. After failing to locate the hotel, Azilah and I returned to Central Market and while we were there, Azilah asked an artist at Central Market for directions to Malaya Hotel. The artist, who was Malay, drew a plan of the location of Malaya Hotel . After that Azilah and I walked towards Malaya Hotel. We reached Malaya Hotel at 4.00pm. When we arrived at Malaya Hotel, Azilah invited me to go to the 8th floor of the hotel. After we reached the 8th floor Azilah showed me the room that was occupied by the woman who was disturbing Razak. While on the 8th floor, Azilah asked me to “shoot to kill” all three women in the hotel room and asked that I stay in any one of the rooms on the 8th or 7th floor or any other floor with all lodging expenses borne by Azilah. I informed Azilah that I would not be able to do it because of the presence of CCTV (closed circuit television cameras). After that Azilah and I took the stairs to the 7th floor to find a suitable room to stay. After looking at the room, I found it to be unsuitable and Azilah and I returned to Central Market. Upon arriving at Central Market, Azilah ordered me to use my car and drive to Razak’s residence to observe the residence. At about 4.30pm Azilah and I were driving when Azilah pointed Razak’s residence to me. I then drove my car and reached a petrol station near the Puduraya area. Azilah filled the petrol tank with RM30 worth of petrol. After filling the petrol, Azilah and I drove back to Razak’s residence in Damansara Heights. After observing Razak’s residence, Azilah and I returned to Central Market to enable Azilah to get his car. After dropping Azilah at Central Market I went to the UTK office in Bukit Aman. After that I did not contact Azilah again. On 19th October 2006 at about 8.30pm while I was at home in Kota Damansara, Azilah contacted me via his mobile phone and asked me to go to Razak’s house immediately. Azilah also mentioned there was a Chinese woman who was causing a commotion in front of Razak’s house. I was ready at about 8.40pm and drove my jeep bearing registration number CAC 1883 towards Razak’s house in Damansara Heights. Upon arriving in Damansara Heights, I stopped my jeep a distance away from Razak’s house. After parking my jeep, I walked towards the entrance of Razak’s house. When I arrived in front of Razak’s house I saw Azilah together with a Malay woman in front of the house. There was a car and Azilah was outside the car and the Malay woman was inside the car. I saw a Chinese woman talking to an Indian man whom I did not recognize and also a Chinese taxi driver who was seated inside the taxi and security guards inside Razak’s house. I then entered the car which was a red Proton Wira and sat in the passenger’s seat. While I was seated in the car, I saw Azilah persuading the Chinese woman with the help of the Malay woman to sit in the same red Proton Wira Aeroback where I was seated. The Chinese woman entered the car and sat behind me while the Malay woman also entered the car and sat behind Azilah who was in the driver’s seat. While Azilah, the Chinese woman, the Malay woman and I were seated in the car, the Chinese taxi driver came and asked for the taxi fare from the Chinese woman. Azilah gave him RM50 but the Chinese man demanded an additional RM150 because he said he had to make several trips. Azilah then gave the Chinese man RM100. After that Azilah drove the Wira car towards my jeep. Upon reaching my jeep, I alighted from the car and drove my jeep out of Damansara Heights towards Kuala Lumpur. During the journey, Azilah called and said we would have to transfer the Chinese woman to my jeep and said that we should look for a spot. When I arrived at Jalan Duta I stopped my jeep by the side of the road and got down from the jeep and I asked Azilah whether the spot was suitable to do the transfer. Azilah replied that it was not suitable and suggested Bukit Aman instead. I then went ahead to Bukit Aman followed by Azilah closely behind and arrived at Bukit Aman at about 10.00pm. Upon reaching Bukit Aman, I stopped my car at the back of the Bukit Aman officers’ mess and Azilah together with the Malay woman brought the Chinese woman to my jeep. I noticed the woman was refusing to get in while being pushed into the back of my jeep. After the Chinese woman got into my jeep, Azilah entered my jeep and sat in the passenger seat. I drove out of Bukit Aman followed by the red Proton Aeroback which was driven by the Malay woman. I could no longer see the red Proton Aeroback driven by the Malay woman once we had passed the entrance to Bukit Aman. Along the journey, Azilah asked me to find a place to “shoot to kill” the Chinese woman. Before arriving at Jalan Duta I noticed the back left tyre of my jeep was punctured. I drove through the Smart Tag lane at the toll booth and stopped on the left hand side of the road to change the tyre. While I was changing the tyre, I noticed two Road Transport Department (JPJ) officers on duty but I continued to change the tyre with Azilah’s help. After changing the tyre, I drove to my house in Kota Damansara to take the explosives that I had kept there. After taking the explosives I got into the jeep and drove to Sungai Buloh and Kuala Selangor before arriving at the Punchak Alam forest reserve at about 11.00pm. At the Punchak Alam forest reserve as I was bringing the jeep to a stop, I felt a pain in my stomach and got out of the jeep and relieved myself (defecated) not far away from the jeep. After I had relieved myself, I went back into the jeep and at the same time I saw Azilah outside the jeep carrying a bag containing an M5 weapon and silencer from the jeep that was located at the foot rest of the passenger seat and gave it to me ordering me to “shoot to kill” the Chinese woman who was inside the jeep. After asking for the Chinese woman’s articles, the Chinese woman surrendered her jewellery. She then asked to be allowed to urinate. Azilah brought her down from the jeep and I saw the Chinese woman urinating by the side of the jeep. After urinating, she saw the weapon that I was holding. I saw that she was in a state of fear and she pleaded not to kill her and said she was expecting. At the same time, Azilah wrestled the woman to the ground and I could see that she had fallen and was in an unconscious state. I opened fire towards the left side of the woman’s head. After the Chinese woman was shot, Azilah removed all her clothes and I took a black garbage bag and Azilah put all the Chinese woman’s clothes into the bag. After putting all her clothes into the bag, Azilah noticed movements in the Chinese woman’s arm and ordered me to fire another shot but the gun did not fire. I then emptied the weapon and loaded the gun again and fired another shot at the same area which was the left side of the woman’s head. I then took a black plastic garbage bag and with Azilah’s help put the bag over the Chinese woman’s head to prevent blood from spilling. After that I lifted the hands of the victim while Azilah lifted the legs of the victim and we carried the victim into the woods. Azilah then carried the bag containing the explosives and handed it to me. I took the explosives and attached it to the victim’s head while Azilah attached the explosives on the victim’s legs up to the abdomen. Azilah then pulled the long wire towards the jeep and I altered the position of the jeep so that it faced away from the woods and drove the jeep about 15 meters from the victim. After the detonation of the explosives, I pulled the excess wire into the jeep and left the scene and headed towards Bukit Aman. Azilah and I arrived at Bukit Aman at approximately 12 midnight. At the UTK office, Azilah handed me approximately RM430. After that I had a bath and changed clothes and put the clothes that I wore during the incident together with the victim’s clothes into a plastic bag. After that, I entered the jeep and drove the jeep to a rubbish container in the Bukit Aman area near a construction site. I threw some of the victim’s belongings and the wire that was used to detonate the explosives together with the empty bag that contained the explosives into the container. After throwing the things, I drove the jeep out of Bukit Aman and head towards my house in Kota Damansara. I threw the victim’s clothes and my own clothes along the way to my house. I arrived at home at about 1.00am and to lay down to rest and slept. After that I did not have any contact with Azilah until I was sent back from Pakistan and was arrested. S. To whom did the MP5 weapon and silencer belong to? J. The weapon belonged to the UTK Bukit Aman and was for my use. S. What do you mean by the word “jimat”? J. Jimat means “shoot to kill”. S. Are you telling the truth. J. Yes it is the truth. The statement was read back to Sirul Azhar Bin Haji Omar KPT/Paspot RF 125591. S. Do you wish to make any amendments or additions to your statement after the statement has been read to you? J. No S. Are you giving this statement voluntarily? J. Yes The recording of the statement ended on 9th November 2006 at 1635 hrs. |
The testimony of the former aide-de-camp of then deputy prime minister Najib Abdul Razak has “no relevance” to the prosecution of former Special Action Force (UTK) duo Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar Umar, attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail said today So Altantuya brought herself to Puncak Alam, shot herself in the forehead and then blew herself up!’Misdirected by the High Court so wouldn’t this make the whole trial a miscarriage of justice based on a technicality issue?
Although the Appeals Court judges did not give many details for their decision to acquit the Altantuya killers except to say that there had been serious misdirection by the lower court, there is little doubt the most glaring flaw was why did they fail to order a retrial, and instead so ‘kindly’ dished out an acquittal – which would mean the killers can never be charged again for the same crime?It is also most unfortunate that the first couple have not dared to utter a word so far despite the public outrage. Both have been implicated and have made denials in the past when accused of involvement in the murder. Now that their ex-bodyguards Azilah Hadri and Sirul Umar Azhar have been freed of their death sentences for killing Altantuya, how can Najib and Rosmah pretend it doesn’t involve them and continue to stay silent?
This is why apart from the public outcry, there is a lot of unease in the legal fraternity. To almost everyone in the country, it is like the powers that be are trying to shield Prime Minister Najib Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor.
And to add salt to the country’s wound, these ruthless ‘invisible hands’ are once again using the nation’s court system to get themselves and their cronies out of a sticky situation. It is beyond shocking, how could they
But – and especially given the Sirul admission of guilt – the scenario and main question remains the same. Why not a retrial? This is the biggest black mark and it will take a long while before Malaysian courts can hope to to recover any respectability after such a debacle.
For Najib, he doesn’t care. He only wants to save his own skin.
Looking at the case from all directions, it is hard to refute that Najib is behind the charades because he is central to the entire Scorpene-Altantuya scandal. Being accused of connection to such a diabolical corruption cum murder case is definitely bad for a person holding the highest office in the country.
This is why Najib must step down immediately. Umno should demand his resignation. Otherwise, Umno will be ridiculed and teased as a party of murderers and thieves.
the two men listened impassively as High Court Judge Zaki Yasin ruled that he found their defense “unbelievable” as “each of them are blaming the other.” He said he was convicting “both of you as charged” with murdering 28-year-old Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu sometime between Oct. 19 and Oct. 20, 2006. “They failed to raise any reasonable doubt” of the prosecution’s case, Zaki said. Lawyers said the two would appeal the verdict.
The court said the two former elite police offers would go free because Najib’s chief of staff, Musa Safri (left), was never called to testify in a trial that was widely regarded as a cooked-up sham designed to protect Najib,
Razak Baginda was initially charged along with the two bodyguards but in a highly unusual proceeding was freed without having to put on a defense despite having delivered a sworn statement that he had asked Najib’s office to do something about Altantuya, his jilted girlfriend, who was harassing him. He immediately decamped for the UK and hasn’t been seen since in Malaysia.The original court case against the two bodyguards was replete with numerous irregularities including the last-minute replacement of the trial judge and prosecution team before the trial began and what appeared to be clear attempts to keep evidence from being introduced in court, including an assertion by Altantuya‘s cousin that she had seen pictures of Altantuya with Najib and Razak Baginda at dinner together.
The woman also testified that all records of her entry to the country with Altantuya had disappeared from the immigration department. Her allegations were never followed up.The decision by the three-member appeal court came despite the fact that Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, one of the two, confessed to the murder in a sworn statement that inexplicably was never introduced in court. Sirul had even been read his rights prior to the confession. He was also not questioned by prosecutors in court about the events he described in the excluded confession.
Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail
Everyone has a set of target to meet, from the lofty to the lowly. Everyone except AG Gani Patail.
Under him, prosecutors have lost a whole bunch of high-profile cases.
But who cares and who is counting, right? He still has a powerful job.
Even a rookie lawyer could have seen that the case against the policemen would have been strengthened by showing their common intent and this could have been done by putting Musa Safri – the man who had contact with them – on the stand.
Gani said yesterday that he still firmly believes that Musa’s testimony has no bearing on the case. But given his track record in the courtroom, why would we rely on his legal brain?
Cynthia Gabriel, Director of the human rights NGO Suaram, issued a statement that the “shocking verdict throws open the murder of Altantuya in 2006 and questions now abound as to who killed her. It also throws open the question on how she was killed. How were the C4 explosives (used to blow up her body) obtained? It’s not like C4 can be obtained at 7-Eleven stores,” she said.
The tangled case has transfixed Malaysian high society for nearly seven years, in major part because of the extraordinary efforts by the government and prosecutors to insulate Najib and his wife, Rosmah Mansor, and others from the case. Those efforts included promising a now-dead private detective RM5 million to shut up and get out of the country after he had implicated Najib in the case.Altantuya was murdered execution-style on Oct.19, 2006, leaving behind a note confessing that she was attempting to blackmail Abdul Razak Baginda, a security analyst and close friend of then Defense Minister Najib, for US$500,000. Although no reason was given for the blackmail attempt, it was thought to have been in connection with the US$1 billion purchase of submarines from a French-owned defense contractor in which Razak Baginda’s wholly owned company, Perimekar Sdn Bhd, received a €114 million commission that was characterized in a French investigation as a bribe to be steered to the United Malays National Organization.
WINNERS
Musa Safri
He got promoted, holds a senior position in Special Branch and occasionally has to deal with the irritation of publicity when the case of Altantuya comes up.
Altantuya Shaariibuu, the former Mongolian model whose life was ended brutally in Malaysia, but no one faces justice for the crime. August 24, 2013.
Yesterday was one such day when the Court of Appeal also said that it was puzzled why this missing piece in the chain of events in the murder of the model was not called to testify for the prosecution.
According to Abdul Razak Baginda, he was introduced to Azilah and Sirul by Musa, who was then the aide-de-camp to Najib. Razak also said that he asked Musa a couple of times what had happened to Altantuya.
The court would have loved to hear from Musa what exactly did Razak tell him about Altantuya, what were his instructions to the police sharpshooters, did either policeman inform him what had happened to Altantuya, and did he tell his boss that he had introduced two policemen to Razak?
So many questions? But Musa was spared the hot seat and the penetrating questions. He still has his comfortable life.
