![2011-04-13-danzcolor4741.jpg]()
In a secular island state where Muslims are a minority–almost 15% of the population–and where religion and politics are very distinct entities, tudung has all this while been barred in schools, hospitals, military forces and among public services frontline personnel
![]()
Singapore is a religiously sensitive society and such differences put the government on a taut nerve. Ethnic Malay representatives in the ruling party initially defended that Muslims should try to step up communication with other communities in the island state, and the wearing of tudung could aggravate the sidelining of the Muslim society.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I’m a regular teenager who loves everything that has to do with fashion. I don’t fancy covering my head like Muslim women are supposed to either and I consider myself someone with a neutral view of things. But the recent hoopla on in social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter over Muslim women being oppressed and suppressed under the burqa is something that I strongly disagree with. I can’t help saying that the media, along with certain sections of society, are exaggerating things as usual.It is simply beyond my logic why people whine and create a lot of commotion over women wearing burqa, but are completely at ease with the so-called “forward” bikini-clad women. Society is okay even with celebrities posing nude for glam magazines but raise an uproar over burqa-clad women. This couldn’t get any more disgusting.The actual question, though, is about the freedom of choice. If a Muslim woman is comfortable with her dressing and is doing no one any harm, then why bother about it? Nobody opposes the lingerie ads and the photos of women in “hot pants” and exposed cleavages printed in magazines and hoardings. Why the double standard? Is this fair in any manner?Coming to the next misconception. I have been hearing this over and over that Muslim women are being oppressed under the burqa. Yes, there are women being oppressed and subjected to the most inhuman torture and brutality imaginable, especially under the Taliban. But there’s a small correction here. Just because a woman is wearing the burqa, it does not necessarily mean she is oppressed. And come to think of it, every Muslim is not a supporter of the Taliban and, on the contrary, many are against them. I live in Calicut, where a majority of the Muslim women I see are under the hijab and some of them I know quite well! But I must say, under the hijab lies the empowered, well-educated, smart, independent women who are also well-versed in English. They go about driving scooters and cars like any other and they are also important decision-makers in the family.As a girl who sees empowered, happy and smart women in hijab around, it is indeed hard for me to digest the statement that women are being suppressed under the burqa. In fact, most of the women I know have chosen to wear this attire out of their own choice and not out of compulsion. While society and feminists are busy saying how narrow-minded the Muslim society is, I would like them to open up their minds a bit and look around before making a solid statement. Of course, there are exceptions like the unfortunate women I mentioned earlier. But my point is that the hijab doesn’t make Muslim women the slightest bit oppressed. It is only a matter of personal choice.I’m a regular teenager who loves everything that has to do with fashion. I don’t fancy covering my head like Muslim women are supposed to either and I consider myself someone with a neutral view of things. But the recent hoopla on in social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter over Muslim women being oppressed and suppressed under the burqa is something that I strongly disagree with. I can’t help saying that the media, along with certain sections of society, are exaggerating things as usual.It is simply beyond my logic why people whine and create a lot of commotion over women wearing burqa, but are completely at ease with the so-called “forward” bikini-clad women. Society is okay even with celebrities posing nude for glam magazines but raise an uproar over burqa-clad women. This couldn’t get any more disgusting.The actual question, though, is about the freedom of choice. If a Muslim woman is comfortable with her dressing and is doing no one any harm, then why bother about it? Nobody opposes the lingerie ads and the photos of women in “hot pants” and exposed cleavages printed in magazines and hoardings. Why the double standard? Is this fair in any manner?Coming to the next misconception. I have been hearing this over and over that Muslim women are being oppressed under the burqa. Yes, there are women being oppressed and subjected to the most inhuman torture and brutality imaginable, especially under the Taliban. But there’s a small correction here. Just because a woman is wearing the burqa, it does not necessarily mean she is oppressed. And come to think of it, every Muslim is not a supporter of the Taliban and, on the contrary, many are against them. I live in Calicut, where a majority of the Muslim women I see are under the
hijab and some of them I know quite well! But I must say, under the
hijab lies the empowered, well-educated, smart, independent women who are also well-versed in English. They go about driving scooters and cars like any other and they are also important decision-makers in the family.As a girl who sees empowered, happy and smart women in
hijab around, it is indeed hard for me to digest the statement that women are being suppressed under the burqa. In fact, most of the women I know have chosen to wear this attire out of their own choice and not out of compulsion. While society and feminists are busy saying how narrow-minded the Muslim society is, I would like them to open up their minds a bit and look around before making a solid statement. Of course, there are exceptions like the unfortunate women I mentioned earlier. But my point is that the
hijab doesn’t make Muslim women the slightest bit oppressed. It is only a matter of personal choiceREADMORE.
SINGAPOREAN SLUTTY COSPARTY GIRLS SINGAPORE’S DEAL OR NO DEAL SEASON 2 AND NUS STUDENT ZANETTA JOAN SIT LEAKED NUThe media usually salivates and greedily laps up stories of “Islam oppressed me, but now I’m liberated! Let’s celebrate!” by women who choose to give up religion. Which is what made the Open Page article,
“Under the veil, we are free souls!” (April 22, 2012) by Jumana Haseen Rahim, a pleasant surprise. While the Taslima Nasreens of the world hog the limelight with their views and definitions of freedom, it is rare that Muslim women, with conflicting views on women’s liberation, are given a chance to voice their thoughts. However, while Jumana’s article speaks out against labelling women in
hijab (veil), it does not explain why many Muslim women feel so passionately about the
hijab.As an educated woman in her early twenties who chooses to wear her religious convictions on her sleeve by practising hijab, I have been subjected to animosity, and worse — pity, from feminists and those who cannot fathom the reasons behind my choice. While I can attribute hurtful, anti-Muslim slurs to narrow-mindedness and bigotry, the assumption made by the educated, so-called forward-thinkers, that we are all oppressed girls whose lifestyles are dictated by the men in their lives, is both frustrating and demeaning.
Hijab is more than just a religious obligation. People need to realise that, in its own right, it symbolises liberty. It gives women the freedom to show male strangers only the parts of the body that they wish them to see. Yes, the simplesalwar kameez and kurti do come under the category of ‘modest’ clothing. But if men want to objectify women, hijab just makes things harder for them. I would even go so far as to call it the ultimate feminist statement. A Muslim woman’s definition of empowerment is being judged by her personality alone, leaving her looks to be appreciated only by those who matter. To those who refer to theburkha as a “medieval garb,” I ask: Why is it that a nun wearing a similar robe is looked upon with respect, while a woman in a burkha is labelled as ‘backward’?
Jumana’s article has received a mixed response. While many agree that it all comes down to personal choice, others raise the valid point that many Muslim girls are compelled to wear burkhas. Having been born into an educated, open-minded family which has kept me aware of my rights as a woman, it is especially painful to hear stories of Muslim girls being forced into burkhas, being deprived of their rights and being made to conform to norms set by misguided men. But can anyone name ONE religion in which patriarchy hasn’t reared its ugly head?
The niqab (face-covering) raises questions about its being not just a threat to security, but also the cause for a woman’s identity to ‘fade away’. A woman who wears the veil is obligated to reveal her identity whenever security demands it — in airports, in banks and in court, and she is fully aware of that.
As for the danger of her losing her identity, it must be understood that the face-veil is worn only when she steps out of her home. It is not worn in front of other women, as well as close male relatives. If only male strangers lose out on the chance of seeing a woman’s face, I fail to comprehend how that constitutes the loss of her identity.
Crimes against Muslim women cannot be attributed to Islam as a religion. Islam was the first to give women the right to own property, to divorce and to remarry (rights that were won by women of other religions only after fighting for them). In order to prevent girl babies being associated with burden, Muslim women are the ones who can ask dowries of their husbands. Islam doesn’t oppress women. Men oppress women. The reasons behind the exploitation of women in all religions and communities are the same: women being kept in the dark about their rights, and patriarchal, skewed interpretations of the religious text.
Later, PM Lee Hsien Loong clarified to the Malay reps that although Singapore is a champion of religious freedom, the accommodation and equilibrium of the entire society must also be taken care of.
Lee’s statement did not offer a clear direction so long as Singaporeans would compromise for the sake of social harmony.The headdress controversy happens in other countries as well, notably France, whose government barred female Muslim students from putting on headdresses in schools in the pretext of preserving the characteristics of the French society while trying to avoid religious segregation.HERE IS SOME SINGAPOREAN EXHIBITIONIST MILF PUTTING ON PUBLIC TITTY SHOWS FOR HER HUSBAND OR LOVER IN THE BACK SEAT OF A CAR AND IN PARKS ON SEVERAL DIFFERENT OCCASIONS. I PERSONALLY LOVE THE PHOTO WITH ‘THE DECLINE OF SINGAPORE’S FIRST GOLDEN AGE’ PLAQUE IN THE BACKGROUND BECAUSE IT IS KINDA IRONIC WITH THE TOPLESS …Read more
Perhaps on the backdrop of highly intricate religious and political factors, there wouldn’t be a definite answer at all whether a person should or should not put on a tudung.Moreover, in a male-dominant society, it is not up to the women to decide whether or not they should put on tudung.
Whether a person should put on a tudung depends on individuals and peer pressure, how she apprehends and accept the religious teachings as well as social and family needs and pressure.
Of course, we are not here to talk about the attire of Muslim women, but the controversies in Singapore have exposed a number of things. For one, the trend of Islamization in a Muslim-minority secular state; and for another, contradictions and frictions between religion and politics.
The same speaks for the controversies surrounding the use of the word “Allah” over here in Malaysia.
The controversies started with an online campaign to urge the Singapore government to allow Muslim women in public services sector to put on tudung at workplace. The proponents claimed that putting on tudung is part of the Islamic teachings and it reflects the sanctity of a woman. The government ban is consequently construed as an impediment to religious freedom.
The online campaign was instantly echoed by several Malay organizations and Islamic bodies while non-Muslim society has viewed the incident with completely opposite perspectives.
![muslim_wedding_hands]()
“A secret locked” is supposed to mean, a Muslim woman’s beauty, which she has kept under her physical hijab, “A tale untold” is supposed to mean her personality which she has kept reserved with her inner hijab which is her sense of modesty Wedding Night of a Muslim Woman My secret locked, a tale untold,The only key, within your hand,
Too sacred for them to be hold, To pure for them to understand.
Tonight I tell that tale to you,An open book for you to read,Your book, I yearn to read it too,And share each breath, your every need.
Gone the lonesome years, weeks, days,For now our hearts have taken flight,
You look at me with longing gaze,And I, at you with shy delight.
Love me; love all that I am,Cherish me as precious treasure,
Teach me with gentle guiding handEndlessly seeking His pleasure.
“World Flirtation League,” which ranked cities by the number of online flirtations initiated per month on the popular social networking and dating site Badoo.com. Officials analyzed 12 million “flirtatious” contacts made on the site over the course of a month, Standing outside a harmless-looking two-storey terrace house, a middle-aged man with a balding pate and wispy white goatee greets people walking by with a constant refrain.
“You want to see my
girl? Come in, come in!” he exhorts every
man in sight, pointing to skimpily-clad
Asianprostitutes waiting in a softly-lit sitting room along a back street in Geylang, Singapore’s red-light district.
The tout says more than 50 customers patronise his business daily.
“Our customers are international, anybody can come as long as they can pay,” he says, brushing aside a reporter’s suggestion that the police might not approve of his operation.
“We’re legal!” he scoffs loudly.
Here is some Singaporean
exhibitionist MILF putting on public titty shows for her husband or
lover in the back seat of a car and in parks on several different occasions. I personally love the photo with ‘The Decline of Singapore’s First Golden Age’ plaque in the background because it is kinda ironic with the
topless modern Singaporean
chick in the foreground. I guess she and the photographer realize the joke when they took the pic. Hopefully this public nudity pic (and all the others) doesn’t signal a decline of a current golden age. And while it was a pretty bold and daring move, they may have forgotten that they live in Singapore despite the huge sign in the background. Lucky for her, no name or any other identifying info was attached to these racy photos.This lady have a lot more nude
pictures of herself in public but unfortunately we could only recovery about ten from the set. So send the rest of her pics in via email or give us a
download link for them in comments so that they can be added to this post if by chance you have them saved on your PC. Anyway, remember to join the Gutter Uncensored fan page on
Facebookat
http://www.facebook.com/pages/GutterUncensoredcom/71689381800 and feel free to leave a suggestion or comment there. And remember to send more interesting pictures and videos (of individuals 18 year-old or older) toGutterUncensored@yahoo.com ASAP. Click on pictures to enlarge.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Despite its prudish reputation — the government still bans magazines like Playboy and Penthouse — Singapore allows prostitution to thrive in strictly designated areas, and Geylang is the largest and most famous.
Brothels operating out of houses — one calls itself “Heaven on Earth” — operate in the district alongside
budget hotels, sidewalk cafes, community associations and even Buddhist temples.
Despite the presence of legal prostitution, foreign
women on short-term visitor passes also ply their trade on the streets and lanes of Geylang, and there seems to be enough business for everyone.
More than a fifth of the island state’s population of five million are foreigners, the majority of them blue-collar and manual workers.
And one million tourists a month now visit Singapore thanks to a booming casino industry.
The local
sex trade came under the spotlight in June last year when the US State Department downgraded Singapore in its Trafficking in Persons (TIP) report.
The report said some women from China, the Philippines and
Thailand were tricked into coming to the city-state with promises of legitimate employment and then coerced into the
sex trade after arrival.
Singapore authorities issued an indignant reply, saying their efforts to curb trafficking had not slackened and asking the US government to look at its own immigration record before commenting on other countries’ situations.
In Geylang’s licensed brothels, customers pay an average of Sg$50 ($38) for
sex inside cramped cubicles, according to operators who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Their primary customers are the masses of testosterone-driven guest workers from China, Bangladesh and Southeast Asia.
Business is best on weekends when hordes of foreign men on their day off throng its narrow lanes looking for fun.
Like other businesses in Singapore, the
sex trade has clear rules.
Brothels can only hire Malaysian, Thai and
Chinese girls between the ages of 21 and 27, said one tout.
Prostitutes are also required to make customers wear condoms and report for monthly medical check-ups, he added.
Streetwalker Dan Dan, a Beijing native who refused to disclose her real name, said an increased presence of plainclothes police was deterring customers from taking up her 100-dollar “guaranteed good” service.
Foreign women like Dan Dan who work
freelance in the sex trade and bring customers to
motel rooms cannot be arrested unless they are caught offering their services out in the street, or violate immigration and other laws.
For a first offence, Dan Dan faces a fine of up to Sg$1,000 if she is caught soliciting in public, with subsequent convictions carrying higher fines and potential jail terms.
But Dan Dan, who has been working Geylang’s alleys since she came to Singapore three months ago, said she was willing to brave the consequences.
“The money’s good on busy days,” she said.
“All we want is for the women to be protected and not
judge them for
the work that they have decided to take on,” she told AFP.
“We believe that one of the better ways to protect women is to ensure that they work in licensed brothels, where there is a fee structure and condoms,” Mathi added.
“This way the women can be protected from exploitation and from succumbing to
diseases.”
With a regulated sex industry, Singapore authorities can turn their attention to women forced into prostitution, she said.
“We see more women in the trade and definitely not all of them are willing.”
Singaporean wild-man Chen Guilin better known as Gary Ng was sentence yesterday to 50 months imprisonment and received a $20,000 fine. He admitted to four charges of forgery and one count each of housebreaking and theft, criminal breach of trust and unlawfully having another person’s identity card. The 28-year-old also pleaded guilty to charges related to having 507 homemade sex videos, most of which were of him having sex with various women. Some of them were willing to be filmed, while others were not. He had hidden a video camera in bag with a slit in it to film his acts like the video below.
Gary Ng titled the 5 minute long video available for download “Sg 32C Accountant” when he first uploaded it to a popular amateur porn site. But this is only one of about 500 sex videos he made in his short sex-blogger career before he was arrested in Singapore. He was useing his blog and videos to hookup with dozens of women. Apparently, a lot of Singaporean women wanted to check out Gary Ng’s skill in bed after seeing what he was capable of. LOL… But all good things must come to an end. The Straits Times report:
Gary Ng, the man dubbed Singapore’s Edison Chen was sentenced to 50 months’ jail and fined S$20,000 (RM46,400) on Wednesday for a series of offences.
Gary, whose real name is Chen Guilin, 28, had admitted to having 507 obscene films, mostly of himself having sex with other women.
Some of the women were willing parties for the filming while others were not. He had hidden a video camera in a plastic bag with a slit to film his acts and uploaded some on the Internet.
The former property agent had also pleaded guilty to four charges of forgery and one count each of housebreaking and theft, criminal breach of trust and unlawfully having another person’s identity card. He committed a total of 21 offences from 2006 to June last year involving property worth S$171,770 (RM398,506).
The prosecution had earlier urged the court to impose a heavy fine and at least four years’ jail in view of the severe aggravating factors.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Paul Wong said Chen was a recalcitrant offender, and that all the offences were dishonest involving pre-planning and scheming.
Chen’s lawyer, Savliwala Din had told the court in mitigation that his client made no excuse for his wrongdoing.
Chen turned to crime when he could not earn enough money from his commissions as a real estate agent, his lawyer added.
Damn, so it was the rescission that caused the fall of the legendary Gary Ng…. and made him turn to a life of crime. Anyway, Gary Ng was arrested after his 27-year-old girlfriend lodged a police report against him. A female lawyer, who represented his girlfriend, had worked with the police to trap Gary Ng by pretending to be eager to sleep with him. The 32C accountant chick in the video below is not that female lawyer but it can’t hurt to pretend. Enjoy! The Screen Shots:
Here Gary Ng is fucking a chick I think he is claiming to be his cousin. I don’t believe that claim but the interesting about this video is the chick kept covering her face and always try to avoid eye contact with Gary. You would think she was aware she was being recorded or perhaps she is really Gary’s cousin. LOL…
Download the Sex Video After the Screen Shots Below!
Gary Ng titled this video “Sg My Cousin” when he uploaded to a popular amateur porn site way before he became famous. Lets hope my theory hold true about all these women Gary is fucking in these videos and they are mostly prostitutes. And most importantly, this chick is not his cousin but rather a cheap freelance hooker off the streets of Singapore. Or else this video is pretty disgusting…. Enjoy! The Screen Shots:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here Gary Ng tearing up some pussy in the shower with his camera running as always. The dude actually took a good bath even soaping up and all while fucking this skinny chick.
.
![]()
![]()
