Who Cares? Yet another Najibs ‘foot in the mouth’ minister and Attorney-General Gani.

We all know that the bibles were not misprints. We all know what Ibrahim actually said and we all know you all are in it together as Umno is Perkasa and Perkasa is Umno. Your paramount leader Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who is Perkasa patron, has decreed it as such,really offended theChristian. The minister has accused that we Christians have wrongly printed our Alkitab (the Bible), thus has to be burned by Muslims. What an insulting statement.

GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN’S PREFERENCES ABOUT THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A FUTURE RECTAL MICROBICIDE FOR ANAL INTERCOURSE

Still waiting for Datuk Zulkifli Noordin to be charged with sedition or some law for uttering insulting words against Hindus? No Further Action.

Still waiting for Datuk Ibrahim Ali to be charged with threatening to burn Malay-language bibles? No Further Action.

Still waiting for Home Minister Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi to be charged with causing grievous hurt? No Further Action.

Still waiting for Malaysia’s Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail (picture) to take action against the rich and powerful implicated in the judicial fixing appointments laid bare by the Royal Commission of Inquiry? Do Not Bother.

In the past 48 hours, the mercury has been rising over the sledgehammer and swift treatment meted out to publicity-seeking duo, Alvin Tan and Vivian Lee, for their mocking Facebook posts on Ramadan and conspicuous inaction against politically-aligned individuals.

Much of the blame has landed in the lap of the Royal Malaysian Police, historically a major player in nothing happening when the accused lives in a tony neighbourhood or has a few political cables.

But a picture is emerging that the biggest obstacle to fair play and justice being part of the country’s legal landscape is the man who has sworn to protect the integrity of Malaysia’s legal system: Attorney-General Gani.

At a press conference last night, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar deflected blame on the inaction against Perkasa vice-president Zulkifli for his cutting comments about Indians and the Hindu religion.

He said that the police completed their probe on BN’s stellar candidate for Shah Alam but were told by the AG that there was no evidence to charge him with anything. So the case involving the man who has enjoyed favourable ties with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak since he left Pakatan Rakyat has been classified as No Further Action.

No evidence? Maybe Gani and his investigators could have got away with that throwaway line in the pre-Internet days. Maybe.

But multitudes of Malaysians have seen Zulkifli insulting and demeaning Indians in a video clip that has gone viral. We have seen the evidence and it is damning, in the same way that thousands of Malaysians have seen that rubbish posted by Alvivi and have been mortified at the stupidity and crass insensitivity of the duo.

In the case of Alvivi, the AG charged them within a week of their Facebook post becoming public knowledge.  Great, Malaysians are all for speedy action.

So please explain what has happened to Ibrahim’s file?

On January 18, in Permatang Pauh, this is what he said: “Muslims must unite to protect their religion. They must seize those bibles, including the Malay editions, which contained the word Allah and other Arabic terms, and burn them.

“This is the way to show anger against the disrespect to our sensitivity.”

This incendiary statement is seditious every day of the week. And yet, seven months later, still no action. Or No Further Action.

Of course, Ibrahim’s defenders such as Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and greenhorn minister Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan said that it was not the Perkasa chief’s intention to insult the Bible.

He was merely articulating a common way to destroy an illegal publication. But here is where that ridiculous argument falls flat: it is not an illegal publication. Under the 10-point plan put forward by the Najib administration, it is permissible for Malay-language bibles to be imported into the country.

In any case, save the arguments about Ibrahim’s intention or motive for mitigation or the plea bargaining stage of the trial.

As former minister and noted lawyer Datuk Zaid Ibrahim wrote in 2011 that Malaysian AG’s assume two roles: legal adviser to the government and Public Prosecutor.

As Public Prosecutor, the AG has to ensure that the criminal justice system functions well and with integrity.  As a Public Prosecutor, the AG works for the rakyat, not Najib or the BN government.

“He is the barometer by which we measure our success as a country governed by the Rule of Law,” said Zaid, who while he was the de facto Law Minister tried to persuade the then PM Tun Abdullah Badawi to make the AG answerable to Parliament.

Surprise, surprise but the Umno ministers and Abdullah were loath to consider changing the reporting structure of the Attorney General or alter anything to do with that office.

Why would they? Why change something when it ain’t broken, right?

The AG betrayed himself when he passed the baby on to Solicitor-General (SG) II Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden,

If Anwar is innocent then why is Saiful still free and there is no action taken against him by the autorities even the religious one? What a shame for Adat Melayu and Islam. There seems to be no justice for the innocent here  The AG has to appeal. Otherwise, how can he respond to the judgment that the DNA evidence could not be upheld because the judge was of the opinion that the authenticity of the DNA could not be ascertained thus suggesting a planted job ! That would require an automatic investigation into the conduct of the police investigators. We all know from Sodomy 1 where this will finally point to  Don’t waste tghe Rakyats money and the courts’ time. Move on, to the next world.wondering when a High Court judge says evidence was not corroborated at the full hearing of so many witnesses, how will at Appeal Court 3 judges could corroborate the testimony without directly hearing the witnesses? A real mockery and abuse of the legal system and a waste of public funds

People get murdered, C4′d, raped, kidnapped etc. And our AG is so concern about one arse which the court had already found not guilty. is this what we call caring for society or abuse of power?The AG should be brought to court instead for wasting Taxpayer’s money and the court’s time. How could a Pulic Office file an appeal without revealing the grounds?

AG is abusing his power by utilizing the national resources to help Saiful on his personal lawsuit on DSAI! The AG final goal is to help UMNO BARU leadership to run down their political rival DSAI! AG is a traitor to the country! He should be hung! UMNO BARU should use their own resources to back Saiful if they want, but cannot abusing the national resources! The grounds of appeal everybody also know….’to make Anwar busy at the order of najis because GE13 is just round the corner’. So Zaki (ex cheap justice), if the judiciary is fair lets see they throw out the appeal at the onset.This further confirmed that the MALAY person and only Malaysian Mahathir, Najib, UMNO and the BN are all AFRAID of is ANWAR IBRAHIM! Anwar has gone through the baptism of fire after his frolic with UMNO/BN. No Malay/Islamic leader/Malaysian has ever tested hell from Mahathir and Najib like Anwar who was physically assaulted, detained under ISA and publicly humiliated with false charges and fabricated evidence in sodomy I and II. Mahathir, Najib, UMNO and the BN are desperately trying at ALL costs to put Anwar in prison to stop him from exposing their misdeeds and evil plan to plunder Malaysia! Malaysians, if we don’t support PR and Anwar, no Malaysians will dare to stand up for us in future!

 One need not be a die-hard Anwar fan to know that AG Abdul Gani Patail is – after Mahathir

the man who lives in greatest fear of Pakatan taking over the Federal Government. The list of his abuses of power is uncountably long. The moment the UMNO-BN regime falls, Gani Patail must be seized and held to account. AG… have you nothing else to focus on? How about taking your head out of PM’s behind and pursue more pertinent matters? Have you not wasted enough of tax payers money?. haven’t you forgotten that you want to fight for justice when you are studying for the law degree? Covering the murder case of Altantunya equates you as a murderer too. Head of the Trial and Appeals division Kamaluddin Md Said, which is more important – appealing to higher court for a review in a sex trial or a murder trial? Stop wasting our taxpayers’ money. Why appeal against Anwar’s sex trial verdict when the judge had made a clear-cut judgement that the crucial DNA sample/evidence had been ‘illegally’ tampered with by a senior police officer.Compare this with the no appeal to the higher court against the acquittal of Razak Baginda in Altantuya murder case. There were many inconsistencies and the main witnessess were not called in the trial. Razak is the only person, and not the two PM’s bodyguards who were sentenced to be hanged, has a link to Altantuya to provide a motive for the murder. DPP Kamaluddin, is it because one is an opposition leader and the other a friend of PM Najib?commend the AG’s Chambers on their efficiency. In Anwar’s acquittal AG file appeal so quickly but in Razak Baginda’s case (which was an accusation of MURDER) no appeal was filed at all. In a murder acquittal, an appeal would be filed as a matter of course but none was. There is clearly a case of double standards here but more imporatantly in Razak Baginda’s case a traversty of the rule of law and a failure of the Malaysian justice system Kamaluddin, when it concerns the Oppositions Leader you are super efficient in appealing against judgements But when it concerns Cronies of Najib Razak YOU closed both your bloody eyes, what sort of Trial and Appeal Division Head are YOU, are you a Balls Licker of sort or Arse Licker either way you are shame and disgrace to the Law profession. Be careful as Allah may reward you with disabled children.

  It is the right of the AG’s chambers to appeal though it is obviously very clear that it is a personal vengeance of Gani Patail and Najib against Anwar. And in Najib’s case, it is for his political survival that when Anwar is put behind bars, then Najib stands a better chance to win the GE.Attorney-General, why was the verdict involving Abdul Razak Baginda not appealed? How much did Najib pay to bailout Baginda?

 Murder case not being appealed, but clear fabricated evidence case is being appealed. AG clearly bias action makes more people like me to vote for PR. But in the case of the acquittal of Razak Baginda in the Altantuya murder, it was a mockery of justice that the AG blatantly refused to appeal the acquittal of Razak Baginda. This was a personal favour that Gani Patail did for Najib who has to rescue his partner in ‘sex and crime’ . You can get away with murder in Malaysia as long as Gani Patail is the AG Justice must not only be served but must be seen to be served. Was it right that a former UMNO member and UMNO lawyer was fast tracked in his promotions after joining the bench and then made a CJ – Tun Zaki Azmi ? Was it right that Zaki’s wife was awarded a negotiated Billion ringgit project for the elevated Kidex highway, with no experience and no expertise. Isn’t this, payback to the CJ for favours rendered to UMNO and the government ?  Was it right for the judge to accept that there was no motive for the murder of Altantuya ? So what is Ariffin Zakaria talking about ? This is corruption, injustice, manipulation and dirt right from the top hierarchy of the judiciary. Fix it first, then talk later.

 When someone has an opinion, his/her opinion may be right or wrong. But it is just an opinion. Does he/she produce proof for his/her opinion? If a judge made a wrong or biased judgment and someone voiced out against the judge, there is nothing to prove because it is an opinion of that person. It would be a clash of opinion (and interpretation of facts) between the judge and that person. The CJ has just insinuated that people can be prosecuted for voicing their opinions. Where is the freedom of speech then when people are threatened with prosecution every time they voiced out their opinions?