Why are the bloody MPs keeping. This treason of the highest order an unforgiveable betrayal of trust voters reposed in themThis has been morally degrading and has turned politics predatory. But things still remained functional. Till prosperity threw up a body of people whose progress in life has little to do with state patronage and who thus resent being subjected to poor governance and extortion.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Gani, squeeze najib’s balls harder and the matter would be put to restt Silence is golden for all. Najib will do nothing since AG has Najib’s marbles in his hand on many issues including Altantuyu & submarine controversy.
a nation led by thieves and plunderersEx-Attorney-General Talib should aim his questions to not only Gani, his successor, but also the Government led by Datu Seri Najib. ” Elegant silence ” on the part of all Ministers and AG is not an option. The loss of territory, Pulau Batu Puteh , is of national interest, urgent and important. The poor show at the International Court of Justice is a shame. How could our leaders treat this sovereignty of Pulau Batu Puteh so very lightly? And most surprisingly, the Home Minister requires a Police Report while the SD is a sworn statement by ex-CId man! Is the HM trying to erase the issue from the public domain? Undoubtedly, this is a hot potato; nobody like sto touch it! But the peopel of Malaysia, and especially teh HRH the Sulktan of Johore, have a strong interest By calling the AG by the ex-AG is barking up the wrong tree! He should have directed the issue to the PM .Talk to the father, and not the son o r the servant, please! Note that you could not hookwink the ICJ ! MPs speak out. Why are they so silence? Does it means treason is accepted to all BN representatives? Malaysians have to remember this when the vote in future
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
So what do you think Attorney General is made of? The zeal to help, to uplift the judiciary, to learn governance if they haven’t, and proclaim publicly that it is not for the lust of power? No it is for self-serving goals, loyalties for sheer benefit, clubbing on to an ideology so as to move down the dissenters. Do we play for the game, or do we play rather aggressively for our own innings? Both, you may say, but if it comes to elimination of one of the two, self-serving goals are preferred, perhaps wiser.Democracy, in its conceptual principles gives one the right to choose, but disturbingly from the lot that is already chosen. Can’t say that money, muscle and manipulation do not go in all that, and putting it bluntly, why should one who has all this not use it for his purpose? The answer is that he probably would, if he found someone more deserving. No harm at all in believing we all are immortals, because when the inevitable happened, no one came back to say, just to say that it was indeed not so.What comes around goes around Best option is for him is to resign or sue Mat Zain
If a particular point of power is known, if the location of the chair that controls other’s destiny is well spotted, facts of history, geography, legends of the past can be quoted for self-serving gains. Does it matter now if Nehru and Patel were probably not on the same wavelength? Yes it does if that is the way you would like to sway the minds of people. I can’t say that as a strategy this is wrong. People actually wait for such stories in election times. The need to have a basis of conviction to cast an honest vote has to be fulfilled. So who do you think proposed to whom? Was it Emperor Akbar, or princess Jodha? Now this is a tricky one for most parties. Probably it was mutual chemistry would be the best response for both major parties. Shift either side, and twenty percent of your vote bank is likely to sway to the convenient side. The Marxists may have the right answer: “It was a decision of the State.” They and only they can get away with such neutral responses. With the polity so fragile and yet so determined in their beliefs, one cannot put the blame entirely on the politicians.The ailments of the judiciary, including, in the first place, that of the Supreme Court, are of another order. The alleged moral turpitude of some of the judges is only one of them. Even on this count, however, the judiciary is loath to allow an impartial and transparent probe by anyone other than the members of its own fraternity. The most recent instance concerns allegations of sexual misconduct against a recently retired judge of the apex court by an intern. Add to this the growing interference of the apex court in legislative and executive areas that are, strictly speaking, beyond its remit. It is argued, doubtless with good reason, that such interference is inevitable when the government and the legislature are unable or unwilling or both to shoulder their constitutionally-mandated tasks. Governance, like nature, abhors a vacuum. But the danger in this argument is that it upsets the delicate balance of power between the three estates of the republic that the Constitution decrees. On this count, too, a lethal virus could render the “software” of democracy obsolete.This corruption takes three forms: loot of the exchequer (the fodder scam, commissions on procurement), sale of patronage (allocation of mining leases) and plain extortion (no clearance till you pay up, complex administrative procedures, each one of which serves as a rent-seeking opportunity).
This mostly involves use of the state machinery. Which means civil servants must collude, getting suborned in the process. They turn unaccountable as well. A dysfunctional legal system facilitates such funding corrupt of politics.
PKR’s Padang Serai MP N. Surendran was scathing as he claimed that this was the common scenario when it came to corruption and misconduct by those in the government. Surendran was responding to Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s statement yesterday that police would not be investigating the explosive allegations in Mat Zain’s SD because it was not a police report.
Mat Zain said two days ago he had handed a copy of his SD to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and senior Putrajaya officials, alleging wrongdoings by Gani over the Pulau Batu Puteh ownership case.
In the 31-page SD, Mat Zain claimed that hundreds of millions of ringgit had changed hands and deposited into a Hong Kong bank account over the Pulau Batu Puteh case, which the International Court of Justice ruled in favour of Singapore.
Mat Zain alleged that Abdul Gani had deliberately lost the case resulting in the ICJ ruling in favour of Singapore. He urged authorities to investigate the actual reason for Malaysia losing the island to Singapore, saying it was a matter of sovereignty.
Ahmad Zahid noted that the authorities would consider investigating the allegations if a police report was lodged on the issue but went on to say that a SD declaration did not amount to a police report, hence no investigation papers have been opened.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Surendran (pic, left) poured scorn on the minister’s contention, pointing out that there was nothing in the Police Act that states they needed a report to launch a probe.
“What if there was a murder? Or an armed robbery? Are they saying that they will not investigate such cases until a report is made?
“In fact, if the police come to know or hear about any wrongdoing, they are duty-bound and obliged to investigate it even if there was no report,” the lawyer insisted.
Echoing a similar sentiment was Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad, who found it “very strange” that Putrajaya has not taken Mat Zain’s allegations seriously.
“These are obviously serious allegations. It involves treason and corruption of the highest order which has threatened the country’s sovereignty.
“And just because no police report was lodged, there is no investigation?” he said, expressing his disbelief.
Describing Ahmad Zahid’s reason for not investigating Mat Zain’s allegations as “flimsy”, Khalid said the case must be brought right up to the King.
“It seems as if our nation’s sovereignty was sold. This is not a minor thing,” the PAS politician stressed.
Mat Zain had also earlier questioned why Najib was keeping mum on the SD.
The former cop pointed out that if Najib had made public the SD which was sent to his office on October 9, the outcome of the Umno polls held later that month could have been different.
Mat Zain said the Umno delegates would then have known what was happening behind the scenes and would have voted differently
That danger is no less acute when governments, both at the Centre, deploy official agencies to get even with rivals. More often than not, such deployment is initiated outside the framework of laws, rules and regulations. Fake encounters and fabricated cases are evidence of this conceited insouciance. But so is the intrusive surveillance of citizens suspected of making life difficult for the rulers of the day: rival politicians, nosey media persons, un-cooperative civilian and police officials, NGOs and, in one instance at least, an individual who posed no such threat. We recently witnessed such conduct in, among other states,even if some other formation were to replace the UPA, the basic conflict between democracy and its corrupt funding would continue to stymie things. At hand is a crisis of political evolution. It must not be confused with a particular alliance’s problems.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
